We love Him because He first loved us; we serve Him because He first served us.
Home­FAQ­Search­Register­Log in
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.Share | 
 

 Nobel Peace Prize

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
AuthorMessage
EnglishRose



Number of posts: 1526
Age: 27
Location: South Yorkshire
Registration date: 2008-09-23

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:34 am

I know I'm not a mod, but can I just suggest that people are careful with what they're saying on this thread. Several members of this forum are using their real names and have their photos as their avatars, and there have been some potentially inflammatory things written on this thread recently. By all means discuss - the weighty things are often good to talk about! - but just be careful.
Back to top Go down
Kyla Denae



Number of posts: 43
Age: 15
Registration date: 2009-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:12 am

RebeccaMc wrote:
There is a man at our church who is a history expert, and he said that the old civilizations that are now extinct began to head down the path to final ruin when they allowed gay marriage. Legalizing it is the first step to annihilating America.

Who can really prove that an unborn child isn't a person or alive?


Rebecca, I just don't think that's true. The Roman Empire fell only after they became super religious and began their march into 'Christendom'. In fact, the high point of the Roman Empire after Constantine (the 'Christian') was the reign of a paganistic athiest!

I think that what will more surely make America fall is that her Christians want the government to play holy spirit, not the fact that we legalize things or don't. If you truly want immorality to stop, why don't you go witness? Give your friends a tract? Why don't more Christians do that instead of pressing the government to do something that is not their job!

If you click the link I posted above, I wrote a blog post on this subject. Wink

Sorry, but I find the hypocrisy astounding. We don't want the government taking over healthcare. We can't trust them to teach our kids about sex. We can't trust them to tax us fairly. We can't trust them for anything, and yet...we want to trust them with deciding what morality is?! Yeah, that makes sense.

The answer is not more government. The answer is not letting the government legislate by the Bible- because we all know they'll just mess it up, like they do everything else. They'll start imposing rules that are 'Biblical', but they won't be. And they'll just use it to grab more power. Do we really want the Bible used as political tool?

Musicgirl- I don't see how that would be sending a mixed message. It would show my homosexual friend (I actually know two lesbians) that I am woman enough to admit they have rights- but they will also know, through my actions, that I think they are committing a sin against God (which, by the way, is no better or no worse than what I myself have committed). As a civil libertarian, I cannot, cannot commit to any push to outlaw basic civil rights.

Another contradiction- we don't want them to have rights, but the minute they come after ours, we throw a fit and jump through hoops to stop it. I'm not saying you yourself have done this, but I've seen it time and time again, and it's just sickening.

I once again repeat my motto- the answer is not legislation, it is evangelization. I want people to recognize their immorality through the working of my God, not through the conniving of my legislator.

I do agree about the reproduction...but at the same time...I think plenty of babies are being born, LOL And not just for 'world domination' (which I think is a stupid goal as all such plots eventually fail). People have babies. We are all wired with a desire for the opposite sex. That's natural. And I don't think it's going to be bred out of the world just yet. At least, not as long as Christians still have some backbone and are willing to preach the gospel to every creature (not just those in the Sunday church pews.)
Back to top Go down
http://teenagemusings7.blogspot.com/
Musicgirl...



Number of posts: 520
Location: in His Shadow
Registration date: 2008-10-11

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:35 pm

I think you're missing one BIG thing about my perspective: I'm not asking to government to add MORE legislation. I'm asking the government to keep the legislation they already have.

I'm a small government person. Get the government out of my life, for goodness sake! It's not their business. BUT, I don't want the government to change legislation that is already in place, especially when it will conflict with the morals established by our founding fathers.

I also find it extremely ironic that the same liberals that want to legalize homosexual marriage are desperately trying to take away our other rights. The hypocrisy in our bi-partisan government goes BOTH WAYS!!

I understand your issue with the modern American church. You are expressing many of the same issues that bother me. However, my political positions have to match my religious commitments. I don't want the government to legislate morality, but I don't want it to change the moral legislation it already has!

_________________
“The contentment of a Christian Hedonist is not a Buddha-like serenity, unmoved by the hurts of others. It is a profoundly dissatisfied contentment. It is constantly hungry for more of the feast of God’s grace.” – John Piper
Back to top Go down
Kyla Denae



Number of posts: 43
Age: 15
Registration date: 2009-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:35 pm

Musicgirl... wrote:
I think you're missing one BIG thing about my perspective: I'm not asking to government to add MORE legislation. I'm asking the government to keep the legislation they already have.

I'm a small government person. Get the government out of my life, for goodness sake! It's not their business. BUT, I don't want the government to change legislation that is already in place, especially when it will conflict with the morals established by our founding fathers.

I also find it extremely ironic that the same liberals that want to legalize homosexual marriage are desperately trying to take away our other rights. The hypocrisy in our bi-partisan government goes BOTH WAYS!!

I understand your issue with the modern American church. You are expressing many of the same issues that bother me. However, my political positions have to match my religious commitments. I don't want the government to legislate morality, but I don't want it to change the moral legislation it already has!


Okay, I see- thanks for clearing that up. I totally agree that the hypocrisy goes both ways. Totally. There's problems on both sides. (Vote third party!!) XD

Let me ask you something- on the subject of going back to things in our founding father's day- during those times, there were laws about fornication, adultery, and divorce. There were laws about smoking. There were laws about drinking. There were laws about rebellion. So should we go back to that? After all, that is the 'founding morals'. Of course, I find that a bit overboard, seeing as those laws (and any laws concerning private lives, period) were only on state books, and were eventually a non-issue. In other words, they weren't enforced any more. States no longer whip people who sleep together, for instance.

During the founding era, there were very, very few laws on the federal level. In fact, there were pretty much...none. Everything of that nature was left to the states, except things like national defense and minting money. That is what the federal government was designed to take care of- not personal morality.

Now, if we're talking about the states- yes, many of them do not have it on the books that gays can be married, etc. But my thinking is- why not? When you think about it, the government doesn't have any business telling us who can or cannot get married! Marriage licenses are unconstitutional! The government- ANY government, state, local, or federal- telling some people they cannot get married, and others they can, is trespassing against the Constitution.

You want personal liberty for yourself. But when it comes to giving personal liberty to someone else, suddenly, we can't. Once again- the solution is not legislation. Legislation will solve nothing. Even just keeping the current laws on the books will solve nothing...because it isn't, hasn't, and by all indications, it will continue to be innefective. The only thing that will keep immorality from taking over is for each and every one of us to take ahold of our Christian initiative to preach the gospel.

That will more surely get rid of abortion and gay marriage than any amount of lobbying.

I still don't understand why you see a contradiction between my Godly duty (preach the gospel) and my national duty (uphold the constitution). I don't see how I can compromise either of those. I believe that if I were to push for legislation against gay marriage, I would violate the latter. So, I should do my hardest to fufill, to the best of my ability, the first. There is no contradiction; they do not cancel each other, to my thinking.

BTW, thanks for bearing with me. I'm incredibly stubborn...in case you hadn't noticed...and this is one of my favorite subjects...in case you hadn't also noticed... Yay!
Back to top Go down
http://teenagemusings7.blogspot.com/
RebeccaMc



Number of posts: 1102
Age: 18
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Registration date: 2009-09-13

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:07 pm

Did you see Thomas's post? It's legalizing these horrid things that makes a country die.
Do you want to see America go extinct in the name of freedom? Do you want to kill our country happily saying "oh well, at least we didn't restrict them"?
In order to preserve the country, we need to keep these things illegal.
Back to top Go down
http://rubberducks4ever.blogspot.com
Musicgirl...



Number of posts: 520
Location: in His Shadow
Registration date: 2008-10-11

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:42 pm

Well, you bring up another sticky part of the issue......state vs. federal government. I'm, personally, an advocate for state rights. As much as I appreciate what Lincoln did during his presidency, I have a really hard time justifying it. As much as I agreed with Bush's perspective in the Terry Shivo (sp?) case, I couldn't justify his quickness in stepping in.

First of all, let me say that I agree that the only REAL way to solve morality issues is through evangelism and discipleship. I totally agree. However, what I'm trying to point out is that allowing certain immoral behavior that has always, until recently, been morally repulsive and unacceptable to now be legalized is counter-productive. Essentially, you're making it easier for someone to fall prey to temptation and sin while still telling them that it's wrong. It's like taking your little five-year-old, setting an open jar of cookies right in front of him, within his reach and telling him "don't you dare touch those! I know you can. I know you want to. But you shouldn't!" Ultimately, you're making your own job more difficult because you know your five-year-old is unable to resist the temptation. Then you have to step in and try to fix the problem.

One last thing.....let me take your example of the government "whipping people who sleep together." I'm not saying we should do that, but think about what might have happened if that law were still in place. The punishment might stop more people from committing the immoral deed. If less people were committing sexual sin, there would be less unexpected pregnancy among single women. If there was less unexpected pregnancy, there would be less of a "need" or desire for abortion. If there was less of a demand for abortions, the government might not have legalized abortion. If the government had not legalized abortion, America wouldn't be killing billions of unborn lives.

All this merely to point out that these "moral issues" don't happen in a bubble. If we let loose on a "lesser" issue, it will eventually effect a greater issue. Who knows, maybe someday America will be murdering Christians like the Romans!

And I don't think God's law would fit into the Constitution....especially considering He demanded rebelious children to be stoned! I guess God denied the Israelites their basic human rights. But that was a different time, a different place, a different culture......(she said sarcastically! Wink )

_________________
“The contentment of a Christian Hedonist is not a Buddha-like serenity, unmoved by the hurts of others. It is a profoundly dissatisfied contentment. It is constantly hungry for more of the feast of God’s grace.” – John Piper
Back to top Go down
Bubblies



Number of posts: 99
Age: 20
Location: Adelaide
Registration date: 2009-10-21

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:44 pm

Reserved4one wrote:
Bubblies wrote:
Reserved4one wrote:


Note: this is what the Muslims have been doing for centuries... Puzzled




You make that sound like it's some sort of evil plot by the Muslims...


Maybe not evil, but I believe it's being done on purpose and it's certainly unfortunate for the Christians who haven't been, thus resulting in the Muslims outnumbering us, or soon to be anyway. Muslims, especially those living under Shiria (sp?) Law believe that everyone who isn't a Muslim is an infidel and their religion instructs them to kill all infidels. Might I add that the Bible predicts life-long strife between the Ishmaelites and the descendents of Isaac, and that is making itself manifest in the strife between Israel and all the Muslim countries right now.

I'm simply saying that at the rate of 1.2 children even in the Christian realm, we will eventually die out and Muslims will take over the world completely. I have definite problems with that! Shocked


I doubt it's being done on purpose. Maybe by a few extremists, but believe it or not, the majority of Muslims are normal people like us, who might just want children.

There are a few types of Muslims (like there are different types of Christians) and there are some that do believe they need to kill the non-believers (I think we like to call them terrorists), but they are a small minority. They are like... Westborough Baptist Church is to Christians (or other people who share WBC's views).

I highly doubt Muslims will out breed Christians (we've got the Duggars!!)
Back to top Go down
http://www.facebook.com/TheRealBubbles
Musicgirl...



Number of posts: 520
Location: in His Shadow
Registration date: 2008-10-11

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:22 pm

Don't underestimate the philosophy of Islam! Muslims are normal people just like us but with philosophies contrary to biblical teachings. Don't underestimate the power of Satan to use those seemingly innocent people! God cursed Ishmael and we are seeing the reprocusions of Abraham's sinful decision to this day!

_________________
“The contentment of a Christian Hedonist is not a Buddha-like serenity, unmoved by the hurts of others. It is a profoundly dissatisfied contentment. It is constantly hungry for more of the feast of God’s grace.” – John Piper
Back to top Go down
Bubblies



Number of posts: 99
Age: 20
Location: Adelaide
Registration date: 2009-10-21

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:32 pm

I think it's unfair that God cursed Ishmael. He didn't do anything wrong. Abraham did.

Many people have philosophies contrary to Biblical teachings.
Back to top Go down
http://www.facebook.com/TheRealBubbles
Musicgirl...



Number of posts: 520
Location: in His Shadow
Registration date: 2008-10-11

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:05 pm

Then your tiff's with God, not the rest of us....

_________________
“The contentment of a Christian Hedonist is not a Buddha-like serenity, unmoved by the hurts of others. It is a profoundly dissatisfied contentment. It is constantly hungry for more of the feast of God’s grace.” – John Piper
Back to top Go down
Kyla Denae



Number of posts: 43
Age: 15
Registration date: 2009-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:06 am

RebeccaMc wrote:
Did you see Thomas's post? It's legalizing these horrid things that makes a country die.
Do you want to see America go extinct in the name of freedom? Do you want to kill our country happily saying "oh well, at least we didn't restrict them"?
In order to preserve the country, we need to keep these things illegal.


but you're ignoring the Christian's place in all this. Since when has it been the government's place to play holy spirit?! I thought that was OUR job, not our legislator's!!!!??? WE are supposed to be the salt of earth, to bring light where there is darkness.

No amount of legislation will do that for America. No amount of legislation will keep us from sliding off into hell. The ONLY thing that will stop that is EVANGELIZATION- every single one of us getting off our lazy American duffs and getting out there and doing something for God. That is it. That is the only thing we have to keep immorality from taking over.

The government will do nothing. If we let them legislate morality, they will just mess it up. That is why WE are supposed to take the Word. Jesus did not tell us to mandate the gospel to every creature. He said PREACH it. He did not go to Caesar and ask him to make laws about the immorality he saw about him. You didn't see Paul doing that either. Jonah didn't go to the King of Nineveh and ask him to mandate Bible reading. God didn't do Lot's work for him in Sodom. No. That is not how it works.

WE are supposed to get out there among the people, stop cloistering ourselves in our worlds of make believe, and witness. And teach. And preach, and fulfill our duty. That is what being a Christian is all about! Not about expecting the government to do our work for us. That is why I cannot let the government legislate morality- because it would violate every single Christian duty I have. I would be letting them usurp my Christian duty.

Musicgirl... wrote:
First of all, let me say that I agree that the only REAL way to solve morality issues is through evangelism and discipleship. I totally agree. However, what I'm trying to point out is that allowing certain immoral behavior that has always, until recently, been morally repulsive and unacceptable to now be legalized is counter-productive. Essentially, you're making it easier for someone to fall prey to temptation and sin while still telling them that it's wrong. It's like taking your little five-year-old, setting an open jar of cookies right in front of him, within his reach and telling him "don't you dare touch those! I know you can. I know you want to. But you shouldn't!" Ultimately, you're making your own job more difficult because you know your five-year-old is unable to resist the temptation. Then you have to step in and try to fix the problem.


I am not saying that I allow it. I am merely saying that Constitutionally, I can do nothing about their behavior. I cannot. In fact, if I were to try to legalize such things, it would send a mixed message about my commitment to the Constitution! But I must balance my commitment to that with my commitment to God- my commitment to preach the gospel.

Let me use your five-year old analogy. Let's say I have a five year old. I wish to train him not to take cookies when he is not supposed to, that way I remove the need to keep the cookies out of his reach at all times, hence making my job easier. I get my plan together- I place the cookies on kitchen table, with no barrier or anything. The cookies are there. I get a small 1/4 inch dowel rod, and stick it in my pocket.

I then make it clear to the little boy that he is not to touch the cookies. The cookies are not for him. However, if he is good, he can have a cookie when lunch is over, because cookies are for dessert. (Let's say the cookie is like premarital sex- you can't have one until you've eaten lunch/gotten married. Wink ) So while I am busy in the kitchen, the cookies are still sitting there. The five year old decides he doesn't want to wait for lunch. So he climbs up there, and sticks his hand in the jar. I promptly turn around, and swat his hand with the rod.

This sends a message- just because I left the cookies there, accessible, does not mean that it is OK for him to stick his hand in there before I give him permission. I will repeat this process until he is trained not to stick his hand into the cookie jar until I say he can.

This does not send a mixed message. Now, let me apply my little 'parable'. The little boy is a sinner. I am, in essence, a Christian standing in for God. I am witnessing to a friend. Now, sin is accessible. But it is my job to remind them that sin is wrong, and that they're bondage to it is keeping them from living up to God's plan for them. Through repeated 'training', or witnessing, eventually, they will get the picture. I have not created a double standard. I have not confused them. I have merely fulfilled both my sovereign duties- to God, and to my country.

If I do not evangelize and bring the gospel to everyone I know, I have failed my Godly duty. Sadly, I often find myself lapsing into apathy about the gospel- I find it too hard, too late, too anything to get out of it! I'm trying to remedy that. But I can't let my personal convictions be imposed upon the entirety of the nation. My 'Constitutional conscience' will not allow me to.

On the Muslim issue- I always wonder what in the world Isaac did to Ishmael that made him so mad?! XD
Back to top Go down
http://teenagemusings7.blogspot.com/
Musicgirl...



Number of posts: 520
Location: in His Shadow
Registration date: 2008-10-11

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:33 am

I think you're still missing my point, but whatever....

_________________
“The contentment of a Christian Hedonist is not a Buddha-like serenity, unmoved by the hurts of others. It is a profoundly dissatisfied contentment. It is constantly hungry for more of the feast of God’s grace.” – John Piper
Back to top Go down
RebeccaMc



Number of posts: 1102
Age: 18
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Registration date: 2009-09-13

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:11 pm

Bubblies wrote:
I think it's unfair that God cursed Ishmael. He didn't do anything wrong. Abraham did.



You would call God unfair?
Back to top Go down
http://rubberducks4ever.blogspot.com
Elisabeth



Number of posts: 3076
Age: 19
Location: Southeast Kentucky
Registration date: 2008-09-24

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:20 pm

RebeccaMc wrote:
Bubblies wrote:
I think it's unfair that God cursed Ishmael. He didn't do anything wrong. Abraham did.
You would call God unfair?
Many things God does and has done don't seem fair...and honestly, I don't think God ever guaranteed that He would be fair. But He is just.

_________________
...they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.
Acts 17:11

Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
Back to top Go down
http://www.theelisabethanera.wordpress.com
RebeccaMc



Number of posts: 1102
Age: 18
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Registration date: 2009-09-13

PostSubject: Re: Nobel Peace Prize   Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:56 pm

And also, whose standard of "fairness" are we looking at? We humans probably have a different view of what is fair than God does.
Romans 9 says some things too . . .

13As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

14What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

15For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

16So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.

17For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.

18Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

19Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?

20Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

God can do what He wants. He's God.
Back to top Go down
http://rubberducks4ever.blogspot.com
 

Nobel Peace Prize

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 12 of 13Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next

Permissions of this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
At the Feet of the King :: General Discussion & Encouragement :: Discussion & Encouragement-
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.